DokuWiki

Imperfection Concepts like art and life have to be mixed with each other because there is no point in not separating human activity and the human. Art is life (creative energy - sexual) Who would have thought that? This is the reason why the most intriguing art is the one is about life, which unravels different experiences, recounts specifics, questions, and perspectives.

When it comes to life, it is necessary to reject the idea of a perfectionism that can be attained (in in order to be able to meet this kind of expectation The only art we can refer to is that of film). The nature of error is the essence of being Human The stumbling block upon which we've all fallen at one time or another: the faulty judgement, haste, fear or anger, the unending need for control and security and making the wrong decisions. Don't tell me you have never made any of these errors?

Open: a new perspective to view the world from When we fall, we hurt ourselves more or less and are inclined to judge the cause of our fall, https://chappell-mackenzie-3.mdwrite.net/the-secret-of-profitable-lucio-fontana and to think that the error was a mistake because our expectations set of ourselves and other people. The injury is actually the point from which we see the truth, from which we are no longer in the false notion of perfection (which in the event that it was so would not be a problem) and look at what is broken: we look through the wound and examine ourselves.

Fontana cut with the awareness of breaking, opening, tearing since destruction is often the most creative act, especially in a society that, since a very early time, we are ensconced in a strong, impregnating systems of values and beliefs. It's no accident that Fontana declared in 1963 during an interview with Nerio Minuzzo:

„The critics have always maligned me, however, I never was concerned about it. I just went with it and I didn't take the salute of anyone. Over the years, I was called 'the one that has the holes', with a bit of pity. But today I see that my holes and cuts have created a taste and are widely accepted. They even have practical applications. In theatres and bars, they create ceilings using holes. Because today, you see the public in the street can comprehend the new designs. It is the artists however, who are the only ones to understand more '.

When Fontana refers to streetspeople, he invokes the idea of imperfection in which the hole is a form like any other in which the becoming of life is manifested. He's not scared of dirt nor of the brutality of his creative work and throws tar at an artifact made of plaster of a human figure and calls it 'Black Man'.

Years later, the cut transforms into the conquer of space, in the form of an overthrow of painting and sculpture, by a new space that contains them both: an end to verticality to create an open passageway.

The inhalation and exhaling of the canvas, can be seen from afar in a more cerebral and bourgeois version, of the work that Gina Pane would later do on her skin. The gesture is nevertheless the eternal main character in this context, where art is destined to be destroyed. The wound and the cut are border, path and exchange. The artist herself opens the canvas by splitting it in two and declares its finiteness; the holes are transformed into black holes that give an illusion of depth. They also reveal the vastness that we never be able to comprehend.

We are waiting for new discoveries that we don't yet know Fontana described the cuts as „Waits,“ the openings from which new and new things are born that we don't have a clue about.

When we make an error, or hurt or injure the other one, we must wait a certain time before the reaction. It starts with the shock of making a mistake and the failure overcome, after that, deciding on the steps to take to compensate or to get it out of the way and then waiting for the consequences of that break and the mistake that could be a brand innovative and valuable resource. But it's not.

Many people do not understand (and understand) this philosophy , as they constantly judge the way that human beings and reality should be, too used to the two-dimensional nature that is the nature of canvas. We fight with all our might the best methods, the correct method of presenting and being in the world, so so that we resort to rules that eventually define the concept of normativity.

It's impossible to find anything more confusing. In our belief that we are experts, we apply our yardstick to all other living organisms and ecosystem around the globe However, we see the world from a narrow and biased point of view that has nothing to do with reality. Anthropocentrism, but also individual interpretations of the other that are almost never the most accurate.

Accept that there is no absolute perfection. The same is true of our society, which demands to be the best at all cost, but without reflecting on the fact that perhaps, rather than raising standards, we should learn to be more accepting of the world the way it is. Do we accept pain? Do we accept death? Accept body parts? Do we accept diversity? Most importantly, after accepting, do we honor our diversity?

Very often no is it that we are able to hide what does not coincide with the 'perfection' of our little world or the universe. We are horrified, angry, and irritated and covered up and we then show the very imperfection that we really are, but refuse to accept.

Knowing one's own limits is important and so is understanding the interconnectedness of all that is the world system: either we are ALL placed in a position to do our best, or there's no reason to compete or exert effort, except for the purpose of fuelling inequalities. It's great and good that some with a lot of effort have achieved it, like those who have been so lucky. But in the broader context, always stretching the boundaries just a bit further the definition of 'a perfect' in an impermanent situation; not a „perfection“ in the absolute sense.

Could this ever exist?

Cut and let the truth be revealed We can say that Fontana was a tinkerer, as right from the beginning, Fontana rejected the simple paths of success, preferring to try out the untested and unpredictability, which means he decided to leave the pretense of being the only one, he followed the path of research which led him to discover some truths.

For me, and in my personal opinion, Fontana is the one who rips the veil and allows the light in, even though the black sails are obscured behind the cuts. An artist of spatial art in the same way as one of the forerunners of that art understood not solely as a work, but as a gesture, a gesture, around and in the context of actions on space, performance as the activation of a narrative, and this is the way it is practised today.

For me, his cuts reveal all of this, opening up new perspectives on art and new perspectives on the world and also new questions. The wound for this, is not just pain, the wound reveals the idea of mortality, shortness, uncertainty and fragility. The wound makes us think, makes us question the way we think, and this is vital to stay grounded. As hard as it is to be a victim and as difficult as it is in a perfect story of our existence it is ideal (and right) to learn only by positive reinforcements. As long we as a species are unwilling to avoid each other's suffering as much like our own, we're bound to remain in the unsolved and unfulfilled reality.

So let us enjoy the cinema and its happy endings its beauty that we take for granted and which we take as a model for life as the visual arts contrary to what they appear, are the daughters of pain, and every artist who wishes to speak the truth, has had to go through the pain.