DokuWiki

Inadequacy Concepts such as art and life must mix with one another because there is no reason for keeping a distance between human work and the human itself. The art of life is a form (creative energy - sexual) Who said that? The most interesting art is that it talks about life which unravels different experiences, specifics, questions, and viewpoints.

When it comes to the world, it is imperative to reject the idea of a perfectionism to be reached (in in order to be able to meet this kind of expectation The only art that we can think of is that of film). The nature of error is the essence of being Human and the block into which we have every one of us at one point or another: the faulty judgment, haste or anger, the unending need for control and security, wrong choices. Do you think you've not made any of these errors?

Open: a new perspective from which to look If we slip, we hurt ourselves more or less intensely and are prone to judge that fall, to consider that the error was a mistake because our expectations have of ourselves and others. The wound is actually the point where we can are able to see the truth. It is from here that we can no longer rely on the illusion of perfect (which in the event that it was so shouldn't be hurting) and look at the things that are broken. We look at it and then look at ourselves.

Fontana cut with the awareness the possibility of opening up, breaking or and tearing since destruction is often the most creative action, and especially in a world where, from an early stage, we're immersed in a powerful, imprinted system of beliefs and models. It's no accident that Fontana declared in 1963 during an interview Nerio Minuzzo:

„The critiques always maligned me, but I never worried about it, I went on regardless and I didn't take the salute of anyone. In the past, they called me „the guy that has the holes' with some pity even. But today I see that my holes and cuts have created a taste and are widely accepted. They even have practical applications. In theatres and bars, they have ceilings made of holes. Since today, as you can see the public who walk by understand the new forms. The artists are the ones, unfortunately, who understand less '.

When Fontana refers to streetspeople, he invokes the imagery of imperfection, franck-barker.thoughtlanes.net in which the hole is a shape like any other where the transformation of life is manifested. He's not scared of dust nor the violence of his creative work and throws tar at the sculpture of a man and calls the sculpture „Black Man“.

Years later, the cut becomes the conquest of space, as an overcoming of sculpture and painting by a new space which combines them: a break from verticality, in favor of an open passageway.

This palpitation, inhaling and exhaling from the canvas can be seen from afar in a more philosophical and bourgeois sense, of the work that Gina Pane later did on her skin: the gesture remains the eternal character in the context of art is destined to be destroyed; the wound and the cut represent border, path and exchange. The artist opens the canvas by splitting it in two and declares its finiteness; the holes become black holes that provide depth and make us perceive the vastness that we never be able to comprehend.

Wait: new things we haven't discovered yet Fontana named the cuts „Waits,“ which are the gaps from which new and new things are born which we do not have a clue about.

When we commit a mistake, when we end up hurting or causing harm to someone else, we have a waiting period before we react. It starts with the shock of the error and the failure over, then figuring out what way to go to compensate or to get it out of the way Then we await the consequences of that break and the mistake that could actually be a amazing and new resource. It could also be a waste of time.

Many people do not understand (and do not comprehend) this concept because they are constantly judging the way that human beings and reality are, in addition, affixed to the two-dimensional nature that is the nature of canvas. We continue to defend every inch of our being the best ways, the best way to appear and be in society, so much that we turn to norms that ultimately define the concept of normativity.

There is nothing more absurd than this. In our belief that we are experts, we apply our yardstick to all other living organisms and ecosystem around the globe, but in reality we see it from a narrow and biased point of view which has nothing to do with the reality of Anthropocentrism and individual interpretations of the other that are almost never the right ones.

Accept: no perfection in the absolute sense. This also applies to this society that wants us to be better at all cost, but without pondering the fact that, instead of increasing standards, we need to learn to be more accepting of what is, just the way it is. Do we accept pain? Do we accept death? Do we accept bodies? Do we accept diversity? The most important thing is, after we accept, do you respect our differences?

Very often no do we choose to ignore what does not coincide with the „perfect“ nature of our own little planet or the universe. This causes us to be feel angry, shocked, and disgusted, pushed away, swept under the carpet and then we show the very imperfection that we really are, but do not accept.

Knowing one's own limits is crucial and so is understanding the interconnectedness of all that is the world system. Either we are ALL put in a position to do our best, or there is no incentive or competition worth the effort, except for the goal of creating inequality. It's all very well and great that some people with a lot of effort have achieved it, just like the ones who are fortunate. But in the broader context, always stretching the boundaries of what is possible the definition of 'a perfection' in an imperfect situation; not a „perfection“ in the absolute sense.

Does this even exist?

Cut Let the truth come out We can say that Fontana was a tinkerer, as from the very beginning Fontana resisted the straightforward ways to be successful, opting instead to try out the untested and unpredictability, which is to say, he renounced the idea of being the one that was successful, he pursued the research path that led him to uncover certain facts.

For me, and my personal opinion, Fontana is the one who rips the curtain and lets light in, even though the black sails are obscured in the background. An artist of spatial art as well as one of the forerunners of that art understood not just as a piece of work, but also as a gesture as a gesture, around, and as a consequence of action in space, and performance as the expression of a narrative, of which much is being done today.

His cuts reveal all of these, opening new perspectives to art and new perspectives on the world , and new questions. The wound, for this, is more than pain: the wound is a symbol of the fragility, mortality, and fragility. A wound can make us think as well as make us doubt, and this practice is essential to ensure that we remain on the ground. As hard as it is to be a victim and as difficult as it would be in a perfect narrative of life it is ideal (and appropriate) to learn only through positive reinforcements, as long that we as a nation do not want to be a part of one another's pain as as our own, we are bound to remain in the unsolved and insanity.

So let's enjoy the cinema and its happy endings its beauty that we take as a given and which we take as a model of life as the visual arts however are the children of pain, and every artist who wishes to tell a piece of truth, must go through the pain.